You can have the best manual testing tools, but they won’t improve your results unless you know how, who, what, and when to use them. Manual testing, like any skill, requires knowledge, planning, and good execution to be effective.
There are many ways to do manual testing, each with a specific purpose. But with so many types, it’s easy to get confused since they often overlap or sound similar. To simplify things, let’s break down the main types of manual testing and explain what each one does.
Manual testing is when testers execute test cases without automation tools, carefully checking the software’s functionality to identify defects. This involves a thoughtful comparison of the expected output against the actual outcome. Usually, the manual testing process includes these steps:
Manual testing is important because it allows testers to identify issues that automated testing might miss. It helps ensure the software works as expected in real-world scenarios. Some of the most important goals of manual testing are:
Here's a comparison of key aspects between manual testing and automated testing:
Manual testing approaches involve different methods to check software functionality and structure. Each approach focuses on specific aspects of the system and offers a unique way to identify issues.
Black box testing focuses on testing software without knowledge of its internal code or structure. It examines the software's input and output to ensure it meets the requirements.
Scenario: Testing the login feature of an e-commerce website.
Steps:
Outcome: The system should behave as expected based on inputs, regardless of how the internal code operates.
White box testing involves examining the internal structure, logic, and code of the application. The tester needs knowledge of the source code and the system's internal workings.
Scenario: Verifying the interest calculation logic in a banking application.
Steps:
Outcome: The interest should be calculated correctly according to the code's formula, and the loop should process every account exactly once.
Gray box testing is a hybrid approach that combines black box and white box testing elements. Testers have partial knowledge of the system's internal workings but still focus on testing the software from the user's perspective.
Scenario: Testing the shopping cart functionality on an e-commerce website with access to database information.
Steps:
Outcome: The system should update both the frontend and backend correctly, with stock and cart totals synchronized across both.
Manual testing involves different approaches to validating software's functionality and performance. These approaches help identify defects and ensure the software meets the required specifications.
Functional testing verifies whether the software operates according to defined requirements and specifications. It checks individual features or modules by comparing the expected output with the actual output. The aim is to confirm that the software performs its intended functions properly.
Unit testing assesses individual components or units of the software to ensure each part works independently. This testing occurs at the code level to identify issues early in the development process. It confirms that small modules function as expected before integration.
Integration testing evaluates the interaction between different modules or components in the system. It aims to find issues related to how modules work together, such as data flow or communication problems. This ensures the system performs well as a whole.
System testing reviews the complete software system in an environment that simulates real-world conditions. It checks compliance with functional and business requirements, ensuring that all components operate together in a fully integrated manner.
UAT is conducted to confirm that the software meets end-user needs and business requirements. It involves real users testing the system to determine if it is ready for deployment. This final testing phase validates whether the software can perform tasks in real-world usage.
Non-functional testing inspects aspects of the software that do not pertain to specific functions but address overall performance, reliability, and user experience. It examines factors such as speed, security, usability, and scalability, which are crucial for system stability and user satisfaction.
Performance testing evaluates the system's behavior under specific workloads, including response time and processing speed. It ensures that the software operates well under normal and peak conditions. This helps identify bottlenecks and checks if the system can handle expected user traffic.
Load testing analyzes the system's behavior under heavy user loads or large data volumes. It verifies the system's ability to support the maximum number of users or transactions without degrading performance. This test assesses system capacity and scalability.
Stress testing examines the system beyond its limits to understand its behavior under extreme conditions, such as high traffic or limited resources. The goal is to identify the system's breaking point and observe its recovery from failure. This helps evaluate the system's robustness and stability.
Usability testing assesses whether the system is user-friendly and intuitive for the end user. It reviews the software’s interface and overall user experience, ensuring users can navigate the software effectively.
Regression testing checks that recent code changes have not introduced new bugs or affected existing functionality. Following updates, bug fixes, or enhancements, it verifies that the software continues to work as expected. This helps maintain stability during system evolution.
Full regression testing involves retesting the system after code changes to ensure everything functions correctly. This comprehensive approach is time-consuming and is typically performed when there are significant updates or large-scale code changes.
Selective regression testing focuses on specific areas affected by recent changes. This method is efficient as it narrows the testing scope to impacted areas while confirming their integration with the rest of the system. It is often used for minor updates.
Retesting involves running failed test cases again after developers have addressed identified issues. This confirms that bugs are resolved and functionality is restored, ensuring that fixes are successful in the defect resolution process.
Exploratory testing is an informal method where testers explore the software without predefined test cases. Testers learn about the system and test various functionalities based on their understanding. This approach can help uncover defects in an unscripted manner.
Ad-hoc testing is an unstructured evaluation where testers assess the software without specific plans or documentation. It relies on the tester’s experience and intuition to find bugs that may not be identified through structured testing methods. This is often performed spontaneously for quick issue identification.
Compatibility testing verifies that the software operates correctly across different environments, such as operating systems, browsers, hardware, and devices. It checks that the application delivers consistent functionality and performance regardless of the platform. This testing is critical for ensuring a seamless user experience across various configurations.
Sanity testing is a quick, focused method performed after minor changes or bug fixes to confirm that specific functionality works as intended. It checks critical parts of the software to ensure that changes have not caused major issues. Sanity testing typically occurs before more extensive testing, such as regression testing.
Smoke testing is an initial process to ensure the software's basic functions work after a new build or deployment. It acts as a checkpoint to determine whether the system is stable enough for further testing. If the software fails smoke testing, it indicates significant issues that must be addressed before detailed testing can continue.
GUI (Graphical User Interface) testing focuses on verifying that the software's visual and interactive elements work as intended. It involves testing both functional and non-functional aspects of the user interface.
Looking ahead, manual testing will remain an essential part of software development. Even as testing methods evolve, different types of manual testing will still be key. Functional testing will make sure core features work properly, while usability testing will keep the user experience smooth.
Exploratory testing, with its creative and unscripted approach, will help catch hidden issues, and regression testing will ensure new updates don’t disrupt existing functionality. Ultimately, manual testing brings a human touch that is crucial for making software reliable and user-friendly.
Global App Testing is a valuable platform for optimizing manual testing. We leverage a global network of 90,000 professional testers to deliver fast turnaround times and actionable insights.
With seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines, Global App Testing ensures that applications are thoroughly tested across various scenarios. Our approach improves the quality and reliability of the application and accelerates the development cycle, making it an essential asset for any team involved in manual testing.
Crowdtesting network
Quick turnaround
Actionable insights
CI/CD integration
Scalability
These are some of the manual testing types we specialize at:
Ready to explore further? Sign up now to arrange a quick call and discover how Global App Testing can meet your testing needs!
Functional Testing Vs Unit Testing - In-depth Comparison
Unit Testing vs Integration Testing - What's the Difference
The Only Web App Testing Checklist You'll Need